What Is the Appropriate Antimicrobial Use Surveillance Tool at the Health Facility Level for Uganda and Other Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
What Is the Appropriate Antimicrobial Use Surveillance Tool at the Health Facility Level for Uganda and Other Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
By: JP Waswa, Reuben Kiggundu, Niranjan Konduri, Hassan Kasujja, Lynn Lieberman Lawry, Mohan P. Joshi
Publication: Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance; 7 July 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.07.003
Abstract
An appropriate antimicrobial use (AMU) surveillance system provides critical data and evidence on which antimicrobial stewardship interventions are based. However, Uganda and most other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) lack efficient systems for monitoring AMU due to unique health system challenges. The authors reviewed the key tools available for AMU surveillance in health facilities and present arguments on the need for country authorities to adapt a customized and standardized tool for national uses.
Despite ongoing efforts to set up AMU surveillance programs in Uganda, AMU data remain sparse, with most of the available data collected through antimicrobial stewardship related continuous quality improvement efforts implemented by global AMR control programs. There is variability in the interpretation of available AMU surveillance tools and a need to identify the most appropriate AMU surveillance methodologies and tools for Uganda and other LMICs.
The World Health Organization, regional experts, ministry of health authorities, and other stakeholders should urgently review available tools with a view to adopting a customized and standardized facility AMU surveillance methodology suitable for national-level rollout in LMICs.